subject predicate object context
32307 Creator 1a227f20bba4f5b9a103e50a77caf8b1
32307 Creator 8d51dfbc82df023284033d8e6b156cf5
32307 Date 2011-09-07
32307 Is Part Of repository
32307 abstract In this symposium, we explore the complexities associated with maximising the impact of learning beyond registration on healthcare practice. Over the last two decades, there has been significant investment in continuing professional development (Department of Health, 2010) and yet the responsibility for ensuring returns on this investment in terms of meeting organisational targets and delivering better patient care is still not well understood or articulated (Mackinnon Partnership, 2007). Despite claims of the importance of lifelong learning (see, for example, Hardwick and Jordan, 2002; Atack, 2003; Clark, 2008), there is limited robust evidence to support such assertions. Most of the empirical studies that have been undertaken are small scale and limited to a single presentation of a single educational programme (e.g. Dierckx de Casterlé et al., 2008; Lin et al., 2008). Against a backdrop of major financial cutbacks across the public sector in the UK and other countries, there is increasingly an imperative to target resources effectively, and to demonstrate value for money and quality outcomes for service users. Of relevance to educationalists, healthcare practitioners, students and commissioners, the objectives of the symposium are to: • examine critically the literature concerning the evaluation of CPD, highlighting the associated complexities • provide an overview of the development of the Impact on Practice (ImP) framework and the role of the student, their manager, their employing organisation and the education provider in enhancing the opportunities for CPD to impact on practice • outline our approach to evaluating the ImP framework, including the rationale for adopting realist evaluation to determine what works for whom and under what circumstances • present the evaluation findings and their implications for service providers, education providers and for education commissioning policy and practice. We will achieve these objectives through the presentation of three inter-related papers and discussion with participants.
32307 authorList authors
32307 presentedAt ext-aa86577920195c834d7352cfcf430526
32307 status peerReviewed
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/44939
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/44940
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/45423
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/45424
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/45572
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/45573
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/49995
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/49999
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/50000
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/50010
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/50011
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/651330
32307 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/651331
32307 type AcademicArticle
32307 type Article
32307 label Clark, Elisabeth and Draper, Jan (2011). Whose role is it anyway? maximising the impact of continuing professional development on practice. In: Networking for Education in Healthcare Conference, 6-8 Sep 2011, Cambridge, UK.
32307 label Clark, Elisabeth and Draper, Jan (2011). Whose role is it anyway? maximising the impact of continuing professional development on practice. In: Networking for Education in Healthcare Conference, 6-8 Sep 2011, Cambridge, UK.
32307 Title Whose role is it anyway? maximising the impact of continuing professional development on practice
32307 in dataset oro