subject predicate object context
71983 Creator 83bce7c687ec7efa521db1e442c3d182
71983 Creator ext-67d654b993db4e8104e96b43fb4735c2
71983 Creator ext-690467252a68250986283903a3b38b1c
71983 Creator ext-a2abf778bcb4f38bce671af33fdca3f5
71983 Date 2020
71983 Is Part Of repository
71983 Is Part Of p2214790X
71983 abstract The institutional responses of Africa's new producers to the early 21st century commodity boom differed both between and within countries over time. Despite making similarly sized discoveries in the mid-2000s, Ghana and Uganda took different routes, with Ghana oscillating between a neoliberal modality and a soft version of resource nationalism (depending on which party was in power), whilst Uganda adopted a more consistent and robust resource nationalist position. Current explanations for varieties of resource governance tend to focus on either institutions or ideas. We argue for an alternative theoretical perspective that locates the entwined role of both institutions and ideas within a deeper analysis of a country's ‘political settlement’. This offers a more compelling explanation for the varied responses to the commodity boom in sub-Saharan Africa, and suggests that different types of political settlements have had significant implications for how oil governance has progressed in different contexts.
71983 authorList authors
71983 status peerReviewed
71983 type AcademicArticle
71983 type Article
71983 label Hickey, Sam; Abdulai, Abdul-Gafaru; Izama, Angelo and Mohan, Giles (2020). Responding to the commodity boom with varieties of resource nationalism: A political economy explanation for the different routes taken by africa's new oil producers. The Extractive Industries and Society (Early access).
71983 Title Responding to the commodity boom with varieties of resource nationalism: A political economy explanation for the different routes taken by africa's new oil producers
71983 in dataset oro