| 6816 |
Creator |
99fe1512a1ee9c6d5272fc1d6e928d6b |
| 6816 |
Creator |
d41d7dfb096b11fdfe42a98a2f38cc7b |
| 6816 |
Creator |
ext-0f7f9bc4b23ba6d4a2e5a9513a733a5f |
| 6816 |
Date |
2004 |
| 6816 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
| 6816 |
abstract |
This chapter summarises the methods and main findings of a study of the environmental
impacts of providing HE courses by campus-based and distance/open learning methods.
Methodology
Surveys of 20 UK courses – 13 campus-based, 7 print-based and on-line distance learning
courses – covering travel, paper and print consumption, computing, accommodation,
and campus site impacts. Conversion of results into energy and CO2 emissions per student
per 100 hours of degree study.
Findings
Part-time HE courses reduce energy and CO2 emissions by 60% compared to full-time
campus-based courses and distance learning courses involve nearly 90% less energy
and 85% fewer CO2 emissions than the full-time campus courses. The lower impacts of
part-time and distance compared to full-time campus courses is mainly due to a reduction
in student travel and elimination of much energy consumption of students’ housing,
plus economies in campus site utilisation,. E-learning appears to offer only small
energy and emissions reductions compared to mainly print-based distance learning courses,
mainly because e-learning requires more energy for computing and paper for printing.
Research limitations
Assumptions were made in order to calculate the energy and emissions arising from
the different HE systems. E.g. it was decided to include all the energy consumed in
term-time accommodation for full-time campus students while part-time campus and distance
learning students live at home only requiring additional heating and lighting for
study. Future studies could include more distance and blended learning courses offered
by institutions other than the UK Open University and impacts other than CO2 emissions.
Practical implications
Existing HE sustainability programmes should be broadened beyond considering campus
site impacts and ‘greening the curriculum’. Indeed, were HE expansion to take environmental
impacts seriously, then part-time and distance education should be favoured over increasing
full-time provision. |
| 6816 |
authorList |
authors |
| 6816 |
editorList |
editors |
| 6816 |
status |
peerReviewed |
| 6816 |
type |
Article |
| 6816 |
type |
BookSection |
| 6816 |
label |
Roy, Robin ; Potter, Stephen and Yarrow, Karen (2004). Towards sustainable higher
education: environmental impacts of conventional campus, print-based and electronic/open
learning systems. In: Murphy, D; Carr, R; Taylor, J. and Wong, T.M eds. Distance
Education & Technology: Issues and Practice. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong
Kong Press, pp. 129–145. |
| 6816 |
label |
Roy, Robin ; Potter, Stephen and Yarrow, Karen (2004). Towards sustainable higher
education: environmental impacts of conventional campus, print-based and electronic/open
learning systems. In: Murphy, D; Carr, R; Taylor, J. and Wong, T.M eds. Distance
Education & Technology: Issues and Practice. Hong Kong: Open University of Hong
Kong Press, pp. 129–145. |
| 6816 |
Publisher |
ext-c24dd285d64327352d4c36c5e68639b3 |
| 6816 |
Title |
Towards sustainable higher education: environmental impacts of conventional campus,
print-based and electronic/open learning systems |
| 6816 |
in dataset |
oro |