| 66324 |
Creator |
9910f4a4c67762b95ca1abaa25ffd2a3 |
| 66324 |
Creator |
d7ad5aa3af882a6ced152607da599b23 |
| 66324 |
Creator |
4a30766c4018864cee5667ea28072a99 |
| 66324 |
Creator |
77bdbc7be68ed2177a62f503ba87a071 |
| 66324 |
Creator |
ext-70cacd280ebab57472092775a0aa25ae |
| 66324 |
Date |
2019-08-28 |
| 66324 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
| 66324 |
Is Part Of |
p16641078 |
| 66324 |
abstract |
An eyewitness can contribute to a police investigation both by creating a composite
image of the face of the perpetrator and by attempting to identify them during an
identification procedure. This raises the potential issue that creating a composite
of a perpetrator might then interfere with the subsequent identification of that perpetrator.
Previous research exploring this issue has tended to use older feature-based composite
systems, but the introduction of new holistic composite systems is an important development
as they were designed to be a better match for human cognition and are likely to interact
with memory in a different way. This issue was explored in the current experiment.
Participants were randomly assigned to a feature-based composite construction condition
(using E-FIT), a holistic-based composite construction condition (using EFIT-V) or
a control condition. An ecologically valid delay between seeing a staged crime, creating
the composite, and completing the identification task was employed to better match
conditions in real investigations. The results showed that neither type of composite
construction had an effect on participants’ accuracy on a subsequent identification
task. This suggests that facial composite systems, including holistic systems, may
not negatively impact subsequent eyewitness identification evidence. |
| 66324 |
authorList |
authors |
| 66324 |
status |
peerReviewed |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941041 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941046 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941051 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941052 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941053 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941054 |
| 66324 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/941085 |
| 66324 |
volume |
10 |
| 66324 |
type |
AcademicArticle |
| 66324 |
type |
Article |
| 66324 |
label |
Pike, Graham ; Brace, Nicola ; Turner, Jim ; Ness, Hayley and Vredeveldt, Annelies
(2019). Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction,
Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based
Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article no. 1692. |
| 66324 |
label |
Pike, Graham ; Brace, Nicola ; Turner, Jim ; Ness, Hayley and Vredeveldt, Annelies
(2019). Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction,
Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based
Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article no. 1962. |
| 66324 |
label |
Pike, Graham ; Brace, Nicola ; Turner, Jim ; Ness, Hayley and Vredeveldt, Annelies
(2019). Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction,
Do Not Lead to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based
Systems. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, article no. 1962. |
| 66324 |
Title |
Advances in Facial Composite Technology, Utilizing Holistic Construction, Do Not Lead
to an Increase in Eyewitness Misidentifications Compared to Older Feature-Based Systems |
| 66324 |
in dataset |
oro |