| 52901 |
Creator |
ce5b733bb54d91c76a73d8adcb28edd9 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-00b3ddc02014618570915a08d117ab8f |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-2571eb5c0c6ad7f5a7e5683ba1c00296 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-2b7cd4bbbca3c3d79456f4b2beb8f9c1 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-2b8435b92ce0425b47f91d6b29e30af5 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-62de2f628a9e0fa14e3662193954bf45 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-76448a26fa172cad36a9a67c80863a49 |
| 52901 |
Creator |
ext-ae18564caef14b48df85b662d5d1f7d0 |
| 52901 |
Date |
2018-01 |
| 52901 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
| 52901 |
Is Part Of |
p1526100X |
| 52901 |
abstract |
The paper suggests a minimum set of abiotic and biotic threshold indicators and progress
indicators for forest landscape restoration (FLR), then also briefly discusses progress
indicators of pressures and project outputs. FLR aims to restore multiple functions
of forests at a landscape scale. It is predicated on the hypothesis that restoration
produces enabling conditions for ecosystem services, including <i>regulating services</i>
such as carbon sequestration and pollination, and <i>provisioning services</i> such
as food and energy. As FLR gains greater uptake, it is increasingly important to monitor
progress. The types of indicators required are influenced by the degree of forest
loss and degradation. To measure the status of land under restoration, one or more
abiotic and biotic <i>threshold indicators</i> are required, measuring the return
of enabling conditions for restoration (soil quality, water, etc.), along with <i>progress
indicators</i> measuring the reemergence of the ecosystem services. Although all elements
of the proposed monitoring framework are well known, compiling them into a coherent
system, suitable for application in a wide range of conditions, will take much further
development. |
| 52901 |
authorList |
authors |
| 52901 |
issue |
1 |
| 52901 |
status |
peerReviewed |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639985 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639988 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639990 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639991 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639992 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/639993 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641573 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641574 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641575 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641576 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641577 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/641578 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/662219 |
| 52901 |
uri |
http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/664229 |
| 52901 |
volume |
26 |
| 52901 |
type |
AcademicArticle |
| 52901 |
type |
Article |
| 52901 |
label |
Dudley, Nigel; Bhagwat, Shonil A. ; Harris, Jim; Maginnis, Stewart; Moreno, Jaime
Garcia; Mueller, Gregory M.; Oldfield, Sara and Walters, Gretchen (2018). Measuring
progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic and biotic
indicators. Restoration Ecology, 26(1) pp. 5–12. |
| 52901 |
label |
Dudley, Nigel; Bhagwat, Shonil A. ; Harris, Jim; Maginnis, Stewart; Moreno, Jaime
Garcia; Mueller, Gregory M.; Oldfield, Sara and Walters, Gretchen (2018). Measuring
progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic and biotic
indicators. Restoration Ecology, 26(1) pp. 5–12. |
| 52901 |
Title |
Measuring progress in status of land under forest landscape restoration using abiotic
and biotic indicators |
| 52901 |
in dataset |
oro |