4836 |
Creator |
99fe1512a1ee9c6d5272fc1d6e928d6b |
4836 |
Creator |
fd97f16977b3f5573afa1ea41faa171c |
4836 |
Creator |
ext-d0dcc81b443d6f6f4877cae5415df9d0 |
4836 |
Creator |
ext-d2742a37b61ef7ff2c058ec3ab2ad703 |
4836 |
Creator |
ext-5104c4274518eb0bdf59cb6bbc316eda |
4836 |
Date |
2001-03 |
4836 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
4836 |
Is Part Of |
p15677141 |
4836 |
abstract |
Public transport is frequently subsidised by local or national governments, motivated
by delining average cost arguments, social considerations and the desire to provide
an alternative to private car use. Conventional sources of funding are becoming harder
to sustain and this article explores the use of local hypothecated charges and taxes.
Based on an overview of several case studies from across the world, it is found that
there is a large potential for such mechanisms, both to raise funding and to send
appropriate pricing signals to transport users. |
4836 |
authorList |
authors |
4836 |
issue |
1 |
4836 |
status |
peerReviewed |
4836 |
volume |
1 |
4836 |
type |
AcademicArticle |
4836 |
type |
Article |
4836 |
label |
Ubbels, Barry; Nijkamp, Peter; Verhoef, Eric; Potter, Steve and Enoch, Marcus
(2001). Alternative ways of funding public transport: a case study assessment. European
Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(1) pp. 73–89. |
4836 |
label |
Ubbels, Barry; Nijkamp, Peter; Verhoef, Eric; Potter, Steve and Enoch, Marcus (2001).
Alternative ways of funding public transport: a case study assessment. European Journal
of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(1) pp. 73–89. |
4836 |
Title |
Alternative ways of funding public transport: a case study assessment |
4836 |
in dataset |
oro |