subject predicate object context
44590 Creator d77911700ba5ea1eacad271b42429cd7
44590 Date 2015-10-09
44590 Is Part Of p16130073
44590 Is Part Of repository
44590 abstract This study investigates reflection keywords by contrasting two datasets, one of reflective sentences and another of descriptive sentences. The log-likelihood statistic reveals several reflection keywords that are discussed in the context of a model for reflective writing. These keywords are seen as a useful building block for tools that can automatically analyse reflection in texts.
44590 authorList authors
44590 editorList editors
44590 presentedAt ext-9642b37afe83cbcff3268d9f44fceea3
44590 status peerReviewed
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360457
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360458
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360459
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360460
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360461
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/360462
44590 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/361821
44590 volume 1465
44590 type AcademicArticle
44590 type Article
44590 label Ullmann, Thomas Daniel (2015). Keywords of written reflection - a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology Enhanced Learning (Kravcik, Milos; Mikroyannidis, Alexander; Pammer, Viktoria; Prilla, Michael and Ullmann, Thomas Daniel eds.), pp. 83–96.
44590 label Ullmann, Thomas Daniel (2015). Keywords of written reflection - a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Awareness and Reflection in Technology Enhanced Learning (Kravcik, Milos; Mikroyannidis, Alexander; Pammer, Viktoria; Prilla, Michael and Ullmann, Thomas Daniel eds.), pp. 83–96.
44590 Title Keywords of written reflection - a comparison between reflective and descriptive datasets
44590 in dataset oro