| 28670 |
Creator |
724c40fa3f0a6ad30c9356ca462a4c79 |
| 28670 |
Date |
2004-01 |
| 28670 |
Is Part Of |
p15411672 |
| 28670 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
| 28670 |
abstract |
In the spirit of this collection of essays, I adopt a contentious stance to make my
point. I focus on arguably the most controversial application proposed for the Semantic
Web—namely, knowledge management in organizations. (The fact that it’s not always
seen as controversial demonstrates that all is not well). Now that KM has begun to
mature, those who didn’t see through the technocentric hype in the early days are
rapidly realizing what others sought to emphasize above the roar of computing vendors
and AI researchers revving their engines: the dominant metaphor in much real-world
knowledge work is not the abstracted, indexed, textual <i>knowledge object</i>, but
rather the situated, embodied <i>sensemaking process</i>. |
| 28670 |
authorList |
authors |
| 28670 |
issue |
1 |
| 28670 |
status |
peerReviewed |
| 28670 |
volume |
19 |
| 28670 |
type |
AcademicArticle |
| 28670 |
type |
Article |
| 28670 |
label |
Buckingham Shum, Simon (2004). Contentious, dynamic, multimodal domains and ontologies?
IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(1) pp. 80–81. |
| 28670 |
label |
Buckingham Shum, Simon (2004). Contentious, dynamic, multimodal domains and ontologies?
IEEE Intelligent Systems, 19(1) pp. 80–81. |
| 28670 |
Title |
Contentious, dynamic, multimodal domains and ontologies? |
| 28670 |
in dataset |
oro |