24366 |
Creator |
091ea7ca52ea6aaef4bceb2cc5793f22 |
24366 |
Creator |
8a00af311bb849d51117dc8cd0845ea0 |
24366 |
Creator |
ext-587645a33c601cb2e4524e0d0abddc21 |
24366 |
Creator |
ext-61420edad7f1a4df1bbebbd5a5335ca4 |
24366 |
Date |
1990 |
24366 |
Is Part Of |
p1465394X |
24366 |
Is Part Of |
repository |
24366 |
abstract |
This paper comments on some of the different senses of the notion of discourse in
the various relevant literatures and then overviews the basic features of a coherent
discourse analytic programme in Psychology. Parker's approach is criticised for (a)
its tendency to reify discourses as objects; (b) its undeveloped notion of analytic
practice; (c) its vulnerability to common sense assumptions. It ends by exploring
the virtues of 'interpretative repertoires' over 'discourses' as an analytic/theoretical
notion. |
24366 |
authorList |
authors |
24366 |
issue |
2 & 3 |
24366 |
status |
peerReviewed |
24366 |
volume |
3 |
24366 |
type |
AcademicArticle |
24366 |
type |
Article |
24366 |
label |
Potter, Jonathan; Wetherell, Margaret ; Gill, Ros and Edwards, Derek (1990).
Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2 & 3) pp.
205–217. |
24366 |
label |
Potter, Jonathan; Wetherell, Margaret ; Gill, Ros and Edwards, Derek (1990). Discourse:
noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2 & 3) pp. 205–217. |
24366 |
Title |
Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? |
24366 |
in dataset |
oro |