subject predicate object context
24366 Creator 091ea7ca52ea6aaef4bceb2cc5793f22
24366 Creator 8a00af311bb849d51117dc8cd0845ea0
24366 Creator ext-587645a33c601cb2e4524e0d0abddc21
24366 Creator ext-61420edad7f1a4df1bbebbd5a5335ca4
24366 Date 1990
24366 Is Part Of p1465394X
24366 Is Part Of repository
24366 abstract This paper comments on some of the different senses of the notion of discourse in the various relevant literatures and then overviews the basic features of a coherent discourse analytic programme in Psychology. Parker's approach is criticised for (a) its tendency to reify discourses as objects; (b) its undeveloped notion of analytic practice; (c) its vulnerability to common sense assumptions. It ends by exploring the virtues of 'interpretative repertoires' over 'discourses' as an analytic/theoretical notion.
24366 authorList authors
24366 issue 2 & 3
24366 status peerReviewed
24366 volume 3
24366 type AcademicArticle
24366 type Article
24366 label Potter, Jonathan; Wetherell, Margaret ; Gill, Ros and Edwards, Derek (1990). Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2 & 3) pp. 205–217.
24366 label Potter, Jonathan; Wetherell, Margaret ; Gill, Ros and Edwards, Derek (1990). Discourse: noun, verb or social practice? Philosophical Psychology, 3(2 & 3) pp. 205–217.
24366 Title Discourse: noun, verb or social practice?
24366 in dataset oro