subject predicate object context
1155 Creator 2515c15e5a8e5ef71a6e3a3c05d159fc
1155 Date 2001
1155 Is Part Of repository
1155 abstract The aim of this chapter is to provide an analysis of the use of logically complex imperatives, in particular, imperatives of the form Do A1 or A2 and Do A, if B. We argue for an analysis of imperatives in terms of classical logic which takes into account the influence of background information on imperatives. We show that by doing so one can avoid some counter-intuitive results which have been associated with analyses of imperatives in terms of classical logic. In particular, I address Hamblin's observations concerning rule-like imperatives and Ross' Paradox. The analysis is carried out within an agent-based logical framework. This analysis explicates what it means for an agent to have a successful policy for action with respect to satisfying his or her commitments, where some of these commitments have been introduced as a result of imperative language use.
1155 authorList authors
1155 editorList editors
1155 status peerReviewed
1155 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/165
1155 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/17957
1155 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/19595
1155 uri http://data.open.ac.uk/oro/document/7074
1155 volume 2155
1155 type Article
1155 type BookSection
1155 label Piwek, Paul (2001). Relating imperatives to action. In: Bunt, Harry and Beun, Robbert-Jan eds. Cooperative multimodal communication. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence series, 2155. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 140–155.
1155 label Piwek, Paul (2001). Relating imperatives to action. In: Bunt, Harry and Beun, Robbert-Jan eds. Cooperative multimodal communication. Lecture notes in artificial intelligence series, 2155. Berlin, Germany: Springer, pp. 140–155.
1155 Publisher ext-1c5ddec173ca8cdfba8b274309638579
1155 Title Relating imperatives to action
1155 in dataset oro